Governmental drug policy interests identified in federal statutes include "demand reduction," "supply reduction," and "reducing drug abuse and the consequences of drug USA, by limiting reducing the demand particular goals for the National These types of include:
"Reduction of unlawful drug use to three % of the population";
"Reduction of adolescent unlawful drug use to three percent of these adolescent population";
"Reduction of the availability of cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and methamphetamine";
"Reduction of those respective nationwide average street purity levels and methamphetamine"; and
"Reduction of
Goals are also put forth regarding regard of State and Federal unlawful drug trafficking and distribution; (ii) reduction of State and Federal crimes committed by persons of unlawful drugs; (iii) reduction of towards the the purpose of obtaining unlawful drugs or obtaining property that is is intended to used regarding the purchase of unlawful drugs; and (iv) reduction of drug-related emergency room "Narrow Tailoring" in the Context of Substantive Due Process
Assuming which the governmental interests are compelling, we must judge whether the is narrowly tailored to achieving them. The government must present which its policy passes strict scrutiny. The concept of narrow tailoring is not not properly defined in the context of due process, but had been been fairly well defined in regard for the the First Amendment and Equal Protection. Equal Protection cases also come up out of the Fourteenth Amendment. In Wygant v. Jackson Bd. of Education the Supreme Court held: "Under strict scrutiny the means chosen to accomplish the State's asserted purpose have to be become specifically and narrowly framed In a footnote, the Court described narrow tailoring in even further detail:
The term "narrowly tailored," so cases, has acquired a secondary meaning. More specifically, as commentators just have indicated, the term can end up being used to require consideration of whether lawful alternative and less restrictive means could have been used. Or perhaps, as Professor Ely has noted, the classification